Blord's Legal Counsel Admits 'Ratel' Trademark Claim Was Fabricated
In a stunning revelation that has sent shockwaves through Nigeria's entertainment and cryptocurrency circles, the legal counsel representing controversial entrepreneur BLORD has admitted that his client's claim of trademarking the name "Ratel" was completely fabricated. The lawyer disclosed this explosive information while filing an affidavit in support of BLORD's bail application at the Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday, April 13, 2026.
Tactical Move to Provoke Social Media Critic
According to the legal practitioner, BLORD's assertion that he had legally trademarked "Ratel" was never accurate but rather a calculated maneuver designed specifically to provoke social media critic VeryDarkMan (VDM). "I don't know Blord from anywhere," the counsel stated emphatically. "He only came out to claim he trademarked 'Ratel' just to get under VDM's skin. In reality, he never actually trademarked it."
The lawyer further explained that the entire conflict might have remained a relatively minor social media disagreement had VDM not escalated matters by involving law enforcement authorities. "This whole fight wouldn't have escalated to this level if VDM hadn't rushed to the police, crying that Blord used his name for criminal activities," he added, highlighting what he perceives as the turning point in the dispute.
Dismissing Allegations of Personal Vendetta
Addressing accusations from VeryDarkMan that he was pursuing a personal vendetta against the social media critic, BLORD's lawyer firmly dismissed these claims as completely unfounded. He expressed his unwillingness to engage in public confrontations, stating, "I don't see myself descending so low to join issues with VeryDarkMan for saying I have a personal vendetta against him, making reference to one or two cases."
The legal practitioner also revealed that despite pressure from supporters to pursue cyberbullying charges against VDM, he had declined to take this route. "Some persons have called me that they want to take it up and charge VDM for cyber bullying but I said no," he confirmed, suggesting a more restrained approach to the ongoing legal proceedings.
Background of the Legal Battle
BLORD, whose real name is Linus Williams Ifejirika, was recently arraigned at the Federal High Court in Abuja on multiple serious charges including criminal conspiracy, impersonation, and unauthorized use of VDM's image. Following his court appearance, the cryptocurrency entrepreneur was remanded at Kuje Correctional Centre, a development that sparked intense online debate about the motivations behind the legal actions and their potential implications.
The charges stem from allegations that BLORD improperly used VeryDarkMan's identity and reputation for business purposes without authorization. The case has attracted significant attention due to both parties' substantial social media followings and the intersection of celebrity culture with Nigeria's growing cryptocurrency sector.
Social Media Reactions and Public Perception
The lawyer's revelations have triggered a fresh wave of reactions across social media platforms, with users expressing diverse opinions about the unfolding legal drama. One user commented, "Little wonder Blord is suffering and remains in jail. This is a charge and bail lawyer for affidavit," reflecting skepticism about the legal representation.
Another social media observer noted, "Most Nigerians don't research the background of a lawyer before hiring. They just engage anyone available. But the truth is, all their work ethics and personalities differ," highlighting broader concerns about legal representation in high-profile cases.
VDM's Position and Potential Resolution
Earlier reports indicated that VeryDarkMan had outlined specific conditions under which he might be willing to forgive BLORD and potentially discontinue the legal proceedings that led to the entrepreneur's remand in Kuje prison. However, with the latest revelations about the fabricated trademark claim, it remains uncertain whether these conditions still apply or if the admission will further complicate settlement negotiations.
The case continues to unfold at the Federal High Court in Abuja, with legal experts closely monitoring how the admission about the false trademark claim might impact both the bail application and the broader criminal proceedings. The intersection of social media influence, celebrity culture, and legal accountability has created a complex case that reflects evolving dynamics in Nigeria's digital landscape.
