Veteran Nollywood actor, filmmaker, and public commentator Ugezu J. Ugezu has formally withdrawn allegations he previously made on social media against Prince Daniel Kanu, a former associate of late military ruler General Sani Abacha, and issued a public apology. The withdrawal comes after Ugezu admitted he lacked credible evidence to support the claims.
Ugezu Admits Lack of Evidence
In a statement released on Monday, June 22, Ugezu said he had reviewed his earlier comments and discovered they were not supported by credible evidence, particularly claims suggesting Kanu had been convicted or imprisoned over financial crimes. Ugezu admitted the assertions were inappropriate and should not have been made publicly.
“Upon a careful review of the matter, I have come to the conclusion that I made assertions which I ought not to have made. I have since discovered that I do not possess any credible evidence to support those assertions, and I acknowledge that making them was wrong,” he said.
Full Responsibility and Withdrawal of Claims
The actor accepted full responsibility for the publication, stressing that his role as a filmmaker and public commentator comes with influence that requires careful verification of information before going public. He confirmed the complete withdrawal of the statements and expressed regret over any embarrassment or reputational damage caused to Prince Daniel Kanu, his family, and associates.
“That was never my intention, but I recognise that intentions do not erase consequences, and for that reason I am deeply sorry,” he added. Ugezu also apologised to members of the public who may have been misled and pledged to exercise greater diligence in future.
Impact on Nigeria’s Digital Media Discourse
The development highlights growing scrutiny over accuracy and responsibility in public commentary within Nigeria’s digital media space. As public figures increasingly use social media to share information, the need for verification and accountability becomes ever more critical.
Ugezu’s apology underscores the importance of fact-checking before making allegations that could damage reputations. The incident serves as a reminder to content creators and commentators to prioritise truthfulness and integrity in their public statements.
