Adamawa Court Orders Status Quo in ADC Internal Dispute Pending Hearing
The High Court of Justice in Yola, the capital of Adamawa State, has issued a directive for all parties involved in a legal dispute within the African Democratic Congress (ADC) to maintain the status quo. This order is pending the determination of a motion on notice, as the court seeks to address internal conflicts within the political party.
Court Proceedings and Key Details
On April 9, 2026, Justice Ahmed Isa presided over Suit No. HC/ADSY/63/2026 and delivered the ruling following submissions by counsel Joshua Onoja. The applicants in the case, identified as Shehu Yohanna Kanbile, Ready Boniface, Idi K. Waziri, and Habiba Danjuma, are contesting issues that involve key figures and bodies within the ADC. These include Ishaya Bauka, Jefrey Tsware Barminas, and the party's National Working Committee.
In his ruling, Justice Isa held that the first defendant, General Bauka (retired), is deemed to have been properly notified of the suit. This was confirmed through court processes served by a bailiff, as evidenced by an affidavit. The court emphasized the importance of due process in ensuring all parties are aware of the legal proceedings.
Specific Court Directives
The court issued clear directives to ensure compliance and order during the pending legal process:
- All parties must maintain the current state of affairs until the motion on notice is resolved.
- The court order and motion must be served on all defendants to ensure immediate compliance.
The motion on notice is scheduled for hearing on April 15, 2026, marking a critical date in the resolution of this dispute. Political observers are closely monitoring these developments, as the case is expected to address significant internal disputes within the ADC in Adamawa State. The outcome could have implications for the party's structure and operations ahead of future political activities.
This legal intervention highlights the ongoing challenges within political parties in Nigeria, particularly in managing internal conflicts through judicial means. The court's emphasis on maintaining the status quo aims to prevent any unilateral actions that could exacerbate the dispute before a formal hearing.
