NBA Condemns Judge's Alleged Order for Lawyer to Kneel in Court
The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has strongly condemned reports that a judge of the Federal High Court in Abuja allegedly ordered a lawyer to kneel during court proceedings. The association declared that no judge possesses such powers under Nigerian law, emphasizing the incident undermines judicial dignity.
Details of the Controversial Incident
In a statement issued by its President, Afam Osigwe, the NBA expressed deep concern over an incident said to have occurred on Monday, March 16, 2026. The event involved Justice Mohammed Umar and defence counsel Marshall Abubakar, who was representing activist Omoyele Sowore. According to the NBA, the trial judge reportedly directed Abubakar to step out of the Bar and kneel after the lawyer allegedly raised his voice while addressing the court regarding the suitability of a hearing date.
The judge was also said to have threatened the counsel with committal for contempt. Describing the development as troubling, the association stated that the incident raises serious concerns about the dignity of the legal profession and adherence to established judicial standards.
NBA's Firm Stance on Judicial Conduct
"The courtroom is a temple of justice, governed by law, procedure, and decorum," the NBA stated. It added that while judges possess powers to maintain order, such authority must be exercised strictly within the confines of the law. The body emphasized that although courts have the power to punish for contempt, such powers are guided by clearly defined procedures aimed at ensuring fairness, objectivity, and respect for the rights of all parties.
It stressed that ordering a lawyer—or any individual—to kneel in court is not a recognised judicial sanction and does not align with acceptable standards of judicial conduct. The NBA reminded legal practitioners of their responsibility to maintain professionalism and decorum in court, noting that while lawyers are expected to advocate fearlessly for their clients, such advocacy must be exercised with restraint and respect for judicial authority.
Call for Respect and Proper Channels
"Disagreements with the court, no matter how strongly felt, must be expressed through proper legal channels and not in a manner that disrupts proceedings," the association added. Highlighting the importance of mutual respect between the Bench and the Bar, the NBA said this relationship remains fundamental to the administration of justice and must be protected.
The association called for calm among stakeholders and urged that grievances arising from courtroom incidents be addressed through appropriate institutional and disciplinary mechanisms. It also indicated its readiness to engage relevant authorities where necessary to ensure that the rule of law, judicial ethics, and professional standards are upheld.
