A dramatic scene unfolded at the FCT High Court on Wednesday when defence counsel Mr. Farouk Akambi walked out of the courtroom before proceedings formally commenced in an alleged forgery case. The case involves Abuja-based lawyer Victor Giwa and a co-defendant, Ibitade Bukola, who are accused of forging official documents and impersonating Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Awa Kalu.
At the resumed hearing, prosecution counsel Wisdom Madaki informed Justice Jude Onwuegbuzie that Akambi had been present in court but left without notifying anyone. Madaki stated, "He left before proceedings commenced, leaving the first defendant without representation. The withdrawal is a deliberate attempt to stall the proceedings despite prior service of our response to the first defendant's application for the release of his international passport, along with a further and better affidavit filed on May 22, 2026."
According to the prosecutor, he had shown the document to Akambi for identification. After reviewing it, the defence counsel said he had no objection but maintained that his motion was more important. Madaki added that both defence teams were aware of the court filings.
Following the development, Giwa informed the court that he would represent himself, citing the urgency of his application for the release of his international passport. He relied on his constitutional right to self-representation under Section 36(2) of the 1999 Constitution. Ogbu Aboje appeared for the second defendant.
The prosecution urged the court to proceed with the hearing to avoid further delays, arguing that the matter was ripe for trial. However, Justice Onwuegbuzie declined the request, holding that the defendant's counsel remained on record and was required to account for his absence. The judge ruled, "I will not allow that. The first defendant has counsel. Let him come and clear the air."
The judge stressed that the court expected counsel to either follow proper withdrawal procedures or formally communicate any change in legal representation. He further observed that the defence had shown "no respect for the court" by failing to ensure representation for the defendant or formally notify the court of any change in legal strategy.
Justice Onwuegbuzie subsequently adjourned the matter until June 10 for continuation of trial proceedings.
