An international analyst, referred to online as an 'Oyibo man', has identified the precise weapon used in the controversial United States military strike on ISIS strongholds in Nigeria's Sokoto State. The revelation has sparked intense debate across social media platforms.
Details of the Strike and Weaponry Revealed
The analyst, @Mario Nawfal, cited news reports to confirm that the attack involved Tomahawk cruise missiles. He stated that the operation was carried out on Christmas Day, December 25, 2025, targeting two camps belonging to the Islamic State's Sahel Province (ISIS-SP) within Sokoto State.
In a viral social media post, Nawfal provided critical operational details. He asserted that the missiles were launched by a U.S. Navy warship stationed in the Gulf of Guinea. According to his account, the vessel fired over a dozen Tomahawk missiles in the precision strike. This information came hours after U.S. President Donald Trump confirmed the attack on the terrorist bases.
Mixed Reactions Flood Social Media
The confirmation of the missile type and launch point triggered a wave of reactions from Nigerians and international observers. Many users focused on the implications of the military action.
@AndinoAsuquo succinctly described the operation as "Hit on target", suggesting a belief in its success. @BlueWarriorFx celebrated the news, calling it "the best News so far in the Year 2025" for the Nigerian people and labeling opponents of the strike as terrorists.
However, other comments urged caution and highlighted broader concerns. @MarekPasz noted that while defending innocent lives is crucial, "lasting peace can’t be built on missiles alone", emphasizing the need for long-term solutions alongside security actions.
@Truth_Unfiltere posed a critical question about the strategy's effectiveness: "does this actually slow the slaughter, or just push militants to melt into civilian cover again until the next round." Meanwhile, @hoylejohn69 framed the strike within a larger geopolitical context, viewing the use of a cruise missile in another country as a sign of Western desperation against a rising Africa.
Calls for Proof and Independent Verification
The strike has not been without skepticism. As referenced in the original report, a Nigerian journalist has publicly questioned the operation's claimed success, pointing out a lack of independently verifiable evidence regarding the number of terrorists eliminated.
Another commentator, Steven Yao, echoed this need for transparency. He urged the public to treat specific claims about missile types and casualty counts as "hype" until a clear post-strike assessment is provided by sources beyond official statements.
The U.S. military action in Nigeria's northwest represents a significant escalation in international involvement against terrorism in the Sahel region. While many citizens welcome the direct assault on ISIS affiliates, the event raises profound questions about national sovereignty, the efficacy of remote strikes, and the urgent need for verifiable results in the complex fight against insurgency.
