Billionaire Blord Reacts to N1 Billion Defamation Lawsuit from VeryDarkMan's Legal Team
Nigerian cryptocurrency entrepreneur and billionaire Linus Williams, widely recognized by his alias Blord, has issued a defiant response to a substantial N1 billion defamation lawsuit filed against him. The legal action was initiated by lawyer Abubakar Marshall, who is representing the controversial musician and social media critic Martins Vincent Otse, popularly known as VeryDarkMan.
Blord's Fiery Social Media Retort
In a recent Instagram story, Blord expressed his incredulity at the lawsuit's financial demand. He wrote, "1 BILLION FOR DAMAGES? How much your client pay the SAN HE DEFAMED? THIS MARSHAL BOY NOR JUST WISE AT ALL, MAKE UNA FILE LAWSUIT THE WAY I GO TAKE REPLY WITH 15 LAWSUITE, U GO NEED OTHER LAWYERS TO HELP YOU." This statement suggests Blord is preparing a robust legal counteroffensive as the case progresses to court.
Roots of the Legal Dispute
The lawsuit stems from allegations that Blord referred to VeryDarkMan as an "ex-convict" in public statements. VeryDarkMan's legal team contends this claim is entirely false and constitutes defamation, hence the pursuit of N1 billion in damages for reputational harm. The filing marks a significant escalation in the ongoing public feud between the two prominent Nigerian figures.
Background: The Ratel Pay Billboard Controversy
This legal development follows a recent incident where Blord unveiled a promotional billboard for his newly launched Ratel Pay application. The billboard prominently featured an image of VeryDarkMan holding a phone alongside the app's branding, sparking widespread online debate regarding authorization for such commercial use.
Blord shared video footage of the billboard on Instagram, celebrating it as a milestone and referring to VeryDarkMan as his ambassador with the caption, "MY AMBASSADOR ON THE BILLBOARD FOR THE FIRST TIME !!! SO CUTE , OGENE VIDEO COMING SOON."
Surprisingly, VeryDarkMan responded positively to the unauthorized publicity, stating, "Thank you for promoting my face and the brand ratels……I am greatful [sic]," framing it as beneficial exposure for his personal brand rather than a violation.
Historical Context of the Feud
The relationship between Blord and VeryDarkMan has been contentious for years:
- 2024: VeryDarkMan publicly accused Blord of engaging in fraudulent cryptocurrency practices.
- Early 2026: The dispute intensified over trademark disagreements concerning the "Ratel" brand name.
- Recent Developments: Despite past conflicts, VeryDarkMan's acceptance of the billboard campaign represented an unexpected shift in their volatile dynamic.
Blord has previously characterized their public controversies as strategic maneuvers designed to generate attention for his business ventures, suggesting a calculated approach to their ongoing saga.
Broader Context: Blord's Business Operations
Separately, Blord recently disclosed salary structures within his Blord Group enterprise:
- Entry-level employees receive a minimum monthly salary of N250,000.
- Compensation increases to N400,000 after three years of service.
- After four years, employees earn N500,000 monthly.
According to Blord, the company distributed N1.1 billion in total salaries throughout 2025, with monthly payroll expenditures reaching N90 million to support its workforce. This transparency about his business operations contrasts sharply with the legal drama unfolding with VeryDarkMan's legal representative.
As the N1 billion defamation lawsuit moves forward, all eyes remain on the Nigerian courts to adjudicate this high-profile dispute between two influential personalities in the nation's entertainment and business spheres.
