Nigerian Singer Harrysong Initiates ₦1 Billion Defamation Lawsuit Against Ex-Wife
Nigerian music star Harrysong has taken decisive legal action against his former spouse, Alexer Peres, filing a substantial ₦1 billion defamation lawsuit. This dramatic development follows Peres' recent emotional video announcement regarding the temporary surrender of custody for their two young daughters.
Legal Notice Demands Public Apology Within 14 Days
The legal proceedings became public knowledge on Saturday, 31 January 2026, when Harrysong shared official documents through his Instagram story. His legal representatives issued a formal cease-and-desist notice demanding that Alexer Peres provide a public apology within fourteen days. The notice explicitly states that failure to comply will result in the ₦1 billion damages claim alongside other legal remedies.
According to the legal document, Peres' public statements have allegedly damaged Harrysong's reputation as both a public figure and family man. The singer's legal team emphasized that their client would pursue monetary compensation and equitable relief for what they describe as unlawful conduct and defamatory remarks.
Background of the Custody Dispute
The lawsuit emerges directly from the ongoing custody battle between the former couple. Alexer Peres had previously posted a tearful video explaining her decision to temporarily surrender custody of their three and four-year-old daughters. In her emotional statement, Peres cited emotional exhaustion and ongoing stress since their separation two years ago as primary reasons for her decision.
She expressed feeling overwhelmed by what she described as the singer's repeated interference in her life, including unannounced visits and accusations in legal filings. Peres indicated that these circumstances had drained her mentally, making the custody surrender a necessary step toward regaining stability. She voiced intentions to reclaim the children once she achieves a stronger personal position.
Harrysong's Response and Public Position
Harrysong responded to the custody video through his own social media channels, dismissing claims that he had limited access to his children. The singer explained that his previous silence on the matter had been deliberate, intended to protect both the children and their mother from the long-term effects of public disputes.
In subsequent posts, Harrysong criticized the tendency to transform private challenges into public content, suggesting that creating online material from personal disputes generates unnecessary drama. He reinforced the seriousness of his legal position by sharing the official cease-and-desist letter online, ensuring public awareness of his stance.
Social Media Reactions and Public Commentary
The legal action has sparked significant discussion across Nigerian social media platforms. Various netizens have expressed diverse opinions regarding the substantial lawsuit amount and the broader implications for celebrity relationships.
- Some users questioned the financial practicality of the ₦1 billion claim
- Others urged both parties to settle their differences amicably for their children's wellbeing
- Several commentators reflected on the transformation of intimate relationships into public conflicts
- Many emphasized the lasting impact of legal judgments compared to temporary social media drama
Recent Developments in the Custody Situation
Earlier developments included Harrysong sharing a video of his daughters being taken to their mother's house. In the footage, one child expressed reluctance about the visit while Harrysong gently encouraged them to enter the vehicle. The singer mentioned wanting to avoid further online controversy with his ex-partner during this interaction.
This ongoing situation highlights the complex intersection of celebrity life, family law, and social media in contemporary Nigerian entertainment culture. The substantial financial claim represents one of the more significant legal actions in recent Nigerian celebrity disputes, potentially setting precedents for how public figures address perceived defamation in personal matters.
