Court Orders Runtown Back to Eric Many Label, Restrains Performances Without Consent
Court Orders Runtown Back to Eric Many Label, Restrains Performances

The Federal Capital Territory High Court in Abuja has issued a decisive order affirming that music star Douglas Jack Agu, known as Runtown, remains bound by his 2016 recording agreement with Eric Many Limited. The court also restrained the singer from performing or engaging in commercial activities without the label's consent.

Court Declares Contract Valid and Binding

Justice O. A. Musa, in a ruling dated July 16, 2026, declared that the recording agreement executed in June 2016 between Eric Many Limited and Runtown remains valid and subsisting. The court stated that the contract has not been terminated in accordance with its provisions and continues to bind both parties.

The order specifically requires Runtown to fulfill all contractual obligations until the legal dispute is finally resolved. The court also prohibited the artist from taking any action that could breach the agreement, including unauthorized performances, recordings, tours, or other commercial activities.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Financial Penalties and Trademark Rights

In addition to the contractual declaration, the court awarded ₦53 million in costs and damages against Runtown in favor of Eric Many Limited. Furthermore, the ruling confirmed that the name and trademark “RUNTOWN” belong to the record label. Eric Many was also awarded ₦266 million as the outstanding balance from the label’s investment and expenses on the contract, which had yet to be recouped.

Background of the Legal Battle

The dispute between Runtown and Eric Many, owned by billionaire Prince Okwudili “Dilly” Umenyiora, dates back to 2016 when the singer attempted to exit his recording contract. The label accused Runtown of breaching the agreement by accepting performance bookings, recording music, and planning international tours without authorization. This led to multiple court proceedings in both Nigeria and the United States.

In 2016, interim orders were issued restraining certain performances while the contractual dispute was litigated. The matter returned to court in 2018 after Eric Many alleged Runtown continued performing and releasing music despite existing orders. Over the years, both sides claimed legal victories at different stages, but the latest ruling provides a final declaration that the recording agreement remains in force.

Implications for Future Performances

The court's order means any engagements, including planned international performances such as a proposed United Kingdom tour, must comply with the contractual obligations recognized by the court. Permission for specific events will depend on the terms of the contract and approval from Eric Many. According to the ruling, the contractual relationship remains active, and third parties dealing with Runtown without the label’s consent could face legal consequences.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration