A prominent Nigerian social media influencer known as DonAza has stirred public debate after openly rejecting an invitation from the Federal Government to participate in a special training program on new tax laws. The training, spearheaded by the Presidential Committee on Fiscal Policy and Tax Reform, aims to educate selected content creators on tax reforms set to take effect in January 2026, so they can accurately inform the public.
Rejection and Reason: A Question of Value and Recognition
The controversy erupted on Sunday, December 7, when DonAza responded to an announcement by Taiwo Oyedele, Chairman of the tax reform committee. Oyedele had stated that due to overwhelming interest, the government expanded its initial list of participants for the tax education program to 50 creators, which included DonAza.
In a message posted on his X (formerly Twitter) account, DonAza, known for creating explanatory content on government policies, firmly declined the offer. He questioned the government's priorities, asking, "Is there no public education budget? Please remove my name. How is Reno more valuable than me? Reno for Ambassador, DonAza for suffer."
His comment directly referenced Reno Omokri, a former presidential aide who was recently nominated by President Bola Tinubu for an ambassadorial position. Omokri's nomination is still pending screening and approval by the National Assembly. DonAza's statement highlighted a perceived disparity in how the government values different forms of public service and influence.
Nigerians React: Mixed Responses to the Public Snub
DonAza's public rejection quickly generated a wave of reactions from Nigerians online, revealing divided opinions on his stance.
Some users supported his decision, framing it as a demand for proper compensation. One comment read, "No green for dem, Don Aza. Politicians dey collect $20k appearance fee... They have to pay well or park well." This sentiment reflects a broader skepticism about government initiatives that do not come with tangible remuneration.
Others, however, criticized his approach. A user named Oladapo suggested he should have first accepted the invitation to understand the offer, stating, "It is an invitation, accept the invitation and see what the offer is, definitely it can’t be free when Bomb No dey their head." Another user, Dris, advised that the inclusion on the list was a form of recognition for his work and that his reaction showed "disregard for the system that finds you Worthy."
Some called for his outright replacement. User Angel urged the committee chairman: "There are worthy and more patriotic Nigerians who have been using their platforms to educate without asking for money. Kindly remove Him and find worthy individuals to work with."
Context: The 2026 Tax Reforms and Government's Clarification
The training program is part of the government's strategy to build public understanding of forthcoming comprehensive tax reforms. Earlier reports from the Taiwo Oyedele-led committee have sought to clarify that the new policies, effective from January 2026, are designed to reduce the tax burden for the majority of Nigerians.
The committee has emphasized that contrary to fears of new taxes, the reforms will benefit individuals, small businesses, and corporations. Key highlights include:
- Individuals in the bottom 98% of income earners will pay less or no tax.
- Value Added Tax (VAT) will be removed from essential items like food, education, and healthcare.
- The overall goal is to lower the cost of living and simplify the tax system.
The government's move to enlist content creators is a direct attempt to combat misinformation and ensure these clarifications reach a wide audience through popular digital platforms.
DonAza's rejection, therefore, strikes at the heart of a government initiative seeking collaboration with the digital citizenry. It raises questions about the nature of public engagement, the valuation of influencer contributions, and the challenges of policy communication in modern Nigeria. The episode underscores the evolving dynamic between the state and a new generation of opinion leaders who operate outside traditional structures.
