ADC Lawmakers Condemn Judicial Interference in Party Leadership Dispute
The House of Representatives Caucus of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) has issued a stern warning against what it describes as looming judicial interference in the party's internal leadership structure. At a press conference held at the National Assembly complex, the caucus, represented by Mr. Afam Ogene, expressed deep concern over a pending Supreme Court pronouncement expected to determine the recognized leadership of the ADC.
Legal and Democratic Concerns Raised
The lawmakers argued that issues related to party congresses and leadership fall strictly within the internal jurisdiction of political parties, as outlined in the Electoral Act 2026. They emphasized that the courts lack the authority to adjudicate on such matters, insisting that any judicial pronouncement to that effect would amount to an overreach and a violation of established legal boundaries. This stance highlights a broader debate on the separation of powers and the autonomy of political entities in Nigeria's democratic framework.
Allegations Against INEC and Judicial Compromise
In a significant escalation, the caucus alleged that the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) is complicit in the crisis by recognizing a faction they described as illegitimate, rather than the leadership led by David Mark, which they claim has fulfilled all necessary regulatory conditions. They warned that such actions by the electoral body, if left unchecked, could effectively exclude the ADC from participating in future elections and weaken opposition politics in the country.
Raising broader concerns, the lawmakers alleged a coordinated effort involving elements within INEC and the judiciary to influence the outcome of the case. They described this development as a threat to the credibility of both institutions, calling for immediate scrutiny and reform.
Planned Petitions and Calls for Action
In response to these allegations, the lawmakers disclosed plans to petition the National Judicial Council (NJC) over what they termed "judicial compromise and malfeasance." They are demanding a thorough investigation into the conduct of judicial officers involved in the case, aiming to uphold the integrity of the legal system.
The caucus also referenced concerns earlier raised by the President of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Afam Osigwe, regarding the growing perception of political influence on the judiciary. This adds weight to their claims and underscores the need for transparency and accountability in judicial processes.
Focus on INEC Neutrality and 2027 Elections
While focusing on the leadership dispute, the lawmakers reiterated concerns about the neutrality of INEC, including allegations of partisan conduct against its chairman, Professor Joash Amupitan. They called for his removal, arguing that confidence in the electoral process must be preserved ahead of the 2027 general elections to ensure free and fair democratic participation.
Historical Context and Public Vigilance
The caucus lamented what it described as a decline in judicial independence, recalling the legacy of past jurists such as Chukwudifu Oputa, Niki Tobi, Kayode Eso, and Mohammed Uwais, who upheld the integrity of the bench. They urged Nigerians, civil society groups, and the media to remain vigilant and committed to protecting democratic institutions, stressing that both the judiciary and INEC must act within the bounds of the law to sustain public trust and ensure the stability of Nigeria's democracy.
