Nigeria's 20-Year Census Gap Threatens Fairness of 2027 Elections
Census Gap Poses Risk to 2027 Election Credibility

Nigeria's Frozen Population Census and the 2027 General Elections: A Democratic Crisis

As Nigeria approaches the pivotal 2027 general elections, an event poised to redefine civic trust, political legitimacy, and national direction, the nation faces a profound democratic danger: a political system operating on outdated demographic realities. For two decades, governance has relied on stale estimates rather than an updated snapshot of the people, creating a constitutional and democratic failure with far-reaching political, economic, and social consequences.

The Constitutional Imperative of Accurate Representation

At the heart of Nigeria's democratic order lies the principle of equal representation, enshrined in Section 14 of the Constitution, which affirms that sovereignty belongs to the people and that government derives its authority from them. However, how can governing institutions legitimately claim to represent a population they have not accurately counted since 2006? Electoral boundaries, federal allocations, legislative seats, and political representation are fundamentally tied to population data. Without an updated census, Nigeria's democratic map fails to reflect the actual size, distribution, or composition of its citizens, resulting in a structural distortion of their voices.

A History of Controversial Census Exercises

Since independence, census exercises in Nigeria have been fraught with controversy, politicization, and postponement. Colonial-era counts in the 1950s were disputed, and the 1962 census under Prime Minister Tafawa Balewa was cancelled amid allegations of manipulation. A second attempt in 1963 produced a figure of 55.6 million, but it faced challenges from southern leaders accusing the North of inflating numbers for political advantage. The 1973 census under General Yakubu Gowon recorded 79.8 million people but was scrapped due to widespread allegations of inflation, further eroding public trust.

The 1991 census under General Ibrahim Babangida recorded 88.9 million people and, though criticized, became the planning baseline until 2006. The 2006 census, conducted under President Olusegun Obasanjo by the National Population Commission (NPC), introduced biometric capture and gender disaggregation, recording 140.4 million people. Yet, it faced disputes over methodology and alleged undercounting in certain regions. Today, this figure is nearly two decades old, leaving Nigeria reliant on projections rather than enumeration.

Risks of Relying on Outdated Population Projections

Subsequent data used by government agencies and international institutions have largely been projections derived from 2006 figures, assuming growth rates. Nigeria postponed planned censuses in 2016 and 2022 due to funding constraints, insecurity, and political delays, with a 2023 exercise again deferred. Current projections estimate the population at over 220 million in 2024, potentially rising to between 232 million and 247 million by 2027. However, projections are not substitutes for enumeration, especially in a country with one of the world's fastest-growing populations and youngest demographics.

Internal migration, urbanization, and displacement have dramatically altered Nigeria's demographic landscape. Cities like Lagos, Kano, Port Harcourt, and Abuja have expanded significantly, and millions of young Nigerians have reached voting age. Yet, electoral structures remain anchored to demographic assumptions from 2006, creating serious risks:

  • Constituencies may be grossly unequal in population size.
  • Rapidly expanding urban centers may be underrepresented.
  • Resource allocation may not reflect current needs.
  • Electoral outcomes may not proportionately reflect contemporary demographic realities.

In a democracy, numbers are power. When those numbers are outdated, representation becomes distorted, threatening the credibility of the 2027 elections.

Opportunities for Technology-Driven Census Reform

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has expressed support for a technology-driven census incorporating biometric and digital systems. The NPC has indicated preparedness, reportedly holding approximately 760,000 tablets and planning collaboration with agencies such as the National Identity Management Commission. However, repeated postponements have left the process in limbo, with only the President able to formally set a census date.

As Nigeria intensifies preparations for the 2027 general elections, priority should be given to conducting an adequate, technology-driven census. Digital tools can address geographic complexity through GPS-enabled mapping, reduce human error via built-in data validation, minimize processing delays through real-time transmission, and enhance transparency through auditable digital records. Countries like Namibia in 2011, the United States in 2020, and Rwanda in 2022 have successfully deployed such technologies to improve accuracy and speed.

A modern census must be secure, inclusive, and technologically robust to provide a reliable basis for fair electoral boundary adjustments, strengthen the legitimacy of electoral mandates, improve fiscal allocations tied to population, enable accurate planning in education, healthcare, housing, and employment, enhance investor confidence and international credibility, and restore public trust in governance institutions.

The Urgent Need for Action

Nigeria stands at a demographic and constitutional crossroads. Two decades without an updated enumeration is not merely an administrative oversight; it is a structural vulnerability. Approaching the 2027 elections with a democratic snapshot frozen in time risks skewed representation, contested legitimacy, and weakened public trust. The time for postponement has passed. A comprehensive, inclusive, and technologically enabled census is not a bureaucratic luxury but a democratic necessity. Nigeria cannot afford to count votes without first counting its people. History will judge a nation that chooses delay over data, politics over precision, and expediency over constitutional responsibility. The path to credible elections begins with credible numbers.