NGGN Criticizes ADC's Stance on Yakubu's Ambassador Nomination
Group Faults ADC's Position on Yakubu's Nomination

The Network for Good Governance in Nigeria (NGGN) has strongly criticized the African Democratic Congress (ADC) for its recent comments on the nomination of former Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) Chairman, Prof. Mahmood Yakubu, as an ambassador-designate.

NGGN Calls ADC's Allegations Inconsistent

In a statement released in Abuja on 1 December 2025 and signed by its representative, Comrade Hakeem Mafunnwa, the NGGN stated that the ADC's claim lacks a solid foundation. The group pointed out a direct conflict with the party's own past praise for Yakubu's leadership of the electoral body.

The NGGN reminded the public that the ADC had previously commended Prof. Yakubu for his principled conduct. The group specifically recalled an instance where the party's spokesperson praised him for "standing on the right side of history" when INEC made decisions the ADC viewed as crucial for protecting Nigeria's multi-party democracy.

The NGGN argued it is inconsistent to now suggest his integrity was compromised simply because he received a nomination for further national service after completing his statutory tenure at INEC.

Global Precedents and Diplomatic Role Cited

The governance group further challenged the ADC's position by referencing Nigeria's democratic history and global practices. According to the NGGN, there is no evidence that post-tenure appointments automatically undermine the neutrality of past electoral duties.

The statement highlighted that former INEC chairmen and senior officials have historically moved into various government roles without those appointments being seen as proof of partisanship. Furthermore, the NGGN emphasized that Yakubu's nomination is for a diplomatic posting, not a political role, meaning it does not involve party activities or partisan advocacy.

The group cited international examples, noting that former heads of electoral commissions in established democracies like Canada, India, and South Africa often take on state-endorsed or international assignments after their tenure. In such contexts, these appointments are viewed as a use of technical expertise, not an indicator of political alignment.

Defending the Nomination and Urging National Focus

The NGGN stressed that an ambassadorial role is a representational function of the Nigerian state. It argued that the country's current diplomatic needs require individuals with substantial international exposure, institutional knowledge, and experience engaging with global stakeholders.

Prof. Yakubu's long history of participating in international election missions and engaging with multilateral institutions makes him a valuable asset for Nigeria's foreign service, the group contended.

The NGGN also dismissed calls for the former INEC Chairman to reject the nomination, describing them as unnecessary. It stated that institutional credibility is maintained when public officers complete their tenure professionally, avoid political roles while in service, and uphold proper conduct afterwards.

Finally, the group urged political actors to avoid statements that could erode public trust in national institutions. It called for disagreements to be based on evidence rather than shifting political sentiments. The NGGN concluded that Prof. Yakubu's nomination aligns with established democratic norms and does not retroactively affect the integrity of the elections conducted under his watch. They advocated for a national focus on strengthening Nigeria's diplomatic representation instead of fostering controversy over a constitutionally valid nomination.