Federal Government Initiates Legal Action Against El-Rufai Over Phone Tapping Remarks
The Federal Government of Nigeria has officially commenced legal proceedings against former Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai, following his televised admission regarding the alleged illegal interception of phone communications belonging to the National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu. This lawsuit marks a significant escalation in the ongoing discourse surrounding privacy, security, and legal accountability within the nation's political landscape.
El-Rufai's Controversial Television Interview
During an appearance on Prime Time, a prominent programme broadcast by Arise Television on Friday, February 13, Nasir El-Rufai made a series of startling claims. He asserted that an unidentified individual had successfully "tapped" the phone lines of National Security Adviser Nuhu Ribadu. According to El-Rufai, this unauthorized surveillance enabled him to overhear a conversation in which Ribadu allegedly issued directives for his arrest to security personnel.
El-Rufai elaborated on his statements, acknowledging the inherent illegality of such phone tapping activities while simultaneously arguing that governmental entities frequently engage in similar practices without proper judicial oversight. "He made the call because we listened to their calls. The government thinks they are the only ones that listen to calls but we also have our ways," El-Rufai stated during the interview. He further emphasized, "Someone tapped his phone. The government listens to our calls all the time without a court order. Someone tapped his phone and told us that he gave the order."
Federal Government's Legal Response and Charges
In a decisive reaction to these public declarations, the Federal Government has formally lodged a lawsuit against Nasir El-Rufai at the Federal High Court in Abuja. The legal documents submitted to the court explicitly cite El-Rufai's televised admissions as constituting a violation of Nigerian law. Specifically, the government contends that his statements amount to an offence under Section 12(1) of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) (Amendment) Act 2024.
This legislation is designed to prohibit and prevent various cyber-related offences, including the unauthorized interception of electronic communications. By publicly admitting to knowledge of, or involvement in, such activities, El-Rufai has potentially exposed himself to legal scrutiny and penalties as outlined in the Act. The lawsuit underscores the government's commitment to enforcing cybercrime laws and addressing statements that may imply or endorse illegal surveillance practices.
Implications and Broader Context
The case raises profound questions about the boundaries of free speech, national security protocols, and the legal ramifications of public figures discussing sensitive security matters. It also highlights ongoing tensions between political figures and security agencies regarding surveillance and privacy rights. The Federal Government's action signals a robust stance against any perceived endorsement or revelation of illegal activities, particularly those involving national security apparatus.
As the legal process unfolds, this lawsuit is expected to attract significant public and media attention, potentially setting precedents for how similar cases are handled in the future. It also serves as a reminder of the complex interplay between politics, security, and the rule of law in Nigeria's evolving democratic framework.
