In a striking revelation that has ignited political discourse, a prominent lawyer and author has claimed that President Bola Tinubu's administration is influenced by at least five distinct power groups, or "cabals." Charles Omole, the writer behind a recently launched book on former President Muhammadu Buhari, made these allegations during a television interview.
The Five Alleged Power Groups
Speaking on Channels TV on Thursday, December 18, Omole provided a detailed breakdown of the factions he perceives within the presidency. He emphasized the need for systemic safeguards to prevent what he termed "state capture or presidential capture."
The first group, according to Omole, is led by the Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila. This circle is said to include powerful figures like the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, and the National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu.
The second faction is reportedly centered around the president's son, Seyi Tinubu. Omole suggested this group consists of individuals who secured government appointments through his influence.
A third cabal is allegedly headed by the First Lady, Senator Remi Tinubu. Perhaps most notably, Omole stated that, based on his analysis, one of the five cabals is led by President Bola Tinubu himself.
Context and the Source of the Claims
Charles Omole is the author of a book about the administration of former President Muhammadu Buhari, who governed Nigeria from 2015 to 2023. Buhari passed away in London on July 13 of this year at the age of 82. Omole's position as an author and analyst on presidential affairs lends weight to his claims, though they remain his personal observations.
During the interview, Omole clarified that having influential people around a president is not unusual. His core argument, however, was that without robust systems, such groupings could lead to an unhealthy concentration of power.
Potential Implications for Governance
Allegations of cabals within a presidency are serious, as they suggest governance may be driven by narrow interests rather than national policy. Omole's analysis points to a potential fragmentation of influence at the highest level of Nigeria's government.
If true, the existence of multiple competing power centers could complicate decision-making and policy implementation. The mention of family members and close political allies heading these groups adds a layer of scrutiny regarding access and accountability.
As of now, there has been no official response from the Presidency or the individuals named to these specific allegations. The claims have nonetheless sparked widespread discussion among political commentators and the public regarding the structure of power under the current administration.
