Trump Slams Supreme Court as 'Disgrace' After 6-3 Tariff Ruling
Former US President Donald Trump has launched a scathing attack on the Supreme Court of the United States, following a landmark 6-3 decision that struck down his sweeping tariff policy on Friday. The ruling, which effectively ends one of Trump's major economic initiatives, has ignited a fresh political clash over executive power and trade policy.
Trump's Angry Outburst and Criticism
According to reports, Trump reacted with fury during a White House breakfast with governors, condemning the ruling in an expletive-filled outburst. He described the court's decision as a 'disgrace to our nation,' highlighting his deep dissatisfaction with the judicial outcome. This incident underscores the ongoing tensions between the former president and the judiciary, as he continues to challenge legal boundaries.
Supreme Court's Ruling and Legal Basis
The justices ruled that Trump's tariffs were not authorized under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which permits a president to regulate trade only in 'unusual and extraordinary' circumstances linked to a declared national emergency. In the majority opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts emphasized that the president cannot unilaterally impose tariffs of unlimited 'amount, duration, and scope' without clear approval from Congress. Roberts was joined by conservative Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett, along with the court's three liberal justices, forming a bipartisan majority.
Reactions from Lawmakers and Political Implications
Lawmakers, particularly Democrats, have welcomed the ruling, calling it a win for consumers and a reaffirmation of the constitutional separation of powers. This decision follows earlier rulings by lower courts, including the United States Court of International Trade, which had determined that the Trump administration exceeded its authority in declaring a national emergency to justify the tariffs. The Supreme Court's judgment sets a precedent that could limit future executive actions on trade, sparking debates over the balance of power in US governance.
The ruling not only impacts Trump's legacy but also influences ongoing discussions about trade policy and presidential authority, with potential ramifications for future administrations. As political analysts weigh in, this event highlights the critical role of the judiciary in checking executive overreach and upholding democratic principles.
