Zamfara Political Crisis: Coalition Demands Judicial Review of Rep's Sacking Over APC Defection
Coalition Seeks Review of Judgment Sacking Zamfara Rep

A powerful coalition of civil society organizations has launched a vigorous campaign demanding an immediate review of the controversial court judgment that sacked Hon. Abdulmunim Shehu Danbuga, the member representing Isa/Sabon Birni Federal Constituency in the House of Representatives.

Constitutional Battle Erupts Over Political Defection

The legal firestorm began when the Court of Appeal in Abuja delivered a landmark ruling that terminated Danbuga's legislative career following his high-profile defection from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC). The three-member panel, led by Justice Tunde Awotoye, declared that the lawmaker's seat had become vacant the moment he abandoned the political platform that brought him to power.

Coalition Raises Alarm Over Judicial Precedent

The Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre (CISLAC), leading the charge alongside other pro-democracy groups, has expressed grave concerns about the wider implications of this judgment. They argue that the ruling sets a dangerous precedent that could potentially destabilize Nigeria's political landscape and undermine constitutional democracy.

'This judgment threatens the very fabric of our democratic institutions,' declared Auwal Musa Rafsanjani, Executive Director of CISLAC. 'We cannot stand by while judicial decisions create uncertainty in our political processes.'

Legal Experts Divided on Constitutional Interpretation

The controversy centers around the interpretation of Section 68(1)(g) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, which addresses the circumstances under which a lawmaker can legally defect from their political party. The appellate court maintained that Danbuga failed to provide sufficient evidence of the crisis within the PDP that would justify his cross-carpeting to the APC.

Political Ramifications Spread Beyond Zamfara

Political analysts are watching the unfolding drama with keen interest, noting that the outcome could affect numerous similar cases across the country. The timing is particularly sensitive with ongoing political realignments ahead of future elections.

The coalition's petition emphasizes that the judgment not only affects Danbuga's political future but could potentially disenfranchise the entire Isa/Sabon Birni Federal Constituency, leaving them without representation in the National Assembly.

Demands for Judicial Reconsideration Grow Louder

In their strongly-worded petition addressed to the National Judicial Council (NJC), the coalition outlined several key demands:

  • Immediate review of the appellate court's judgment
  • Clarification on the constitutional provisions regarding political defections
  • Protection of constituents' right to representation
  • Establishment of clear guidelines for future cases of political cross-carpeting

'This is not just about one lawmaker or one constituency,' added Rafsanjani. 'This is about preserving the integrity of our democratic system and ensuring that judicial decisions align with both the letter and spirit of our constitution.'

As the legal battle intensifies, all eyes remain on the judicial system to see how this potentially landmark case will reshape Nigeria's political defection landscape and define the boundaries of constitutional interpretation in years to come.