BREAKING: Nigerian Immigration Service Fires Back at Senator Natasha Over 'Passport Seizure' Claims
Nigerian Immigration Denies Senator's Passport Seizure Claim

The Nigeria Immigration Service (NIS) has issued a strong rebuttal against allegations made by Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, representing Kogi Central, who claimed immigration officials seized her passport at Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport.

What Really Happened at the Airport?

In a dramatic turn of events, the NIS has completely dismissed the senator's narrative, stating that no such passport seizure ever occurred. According to official statements, Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan was merely subjected to routine immigration checks that all travelers must undergo.

The immigration service emphasized that their officers conducted themselves professionally throughout the process and that the senator's travel document was returned to her immediately after the standard verification procedures were completed.

NIS Sets the Record Straight

In their official response, the Nigeria Immigration Service expressed disappointment at what they termed 'baseless allegations' from a high-ranking public official. They maintained that their officers are trained to treat all citizens, including dignitaries, with respect while ensuring national security protocols are followed.

The service made it clear: At no point was Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan's passport confiscated or withheld beyond the normal clearance process required for international travel.

Political Implications and Public Reaction

This public spat between a serving senator and a key government agency has sparked widespread discussion across political circles. Many are questioning the timing and motivation behind the senator's allegations, while others are calling for greater transparency in government-citizen interactions.

The incident highlights the ongoing tensions between political figures and government institutions, raising important questions about accountability and truth in public discourse.

As the story continues to develop, all eyes remain on both parties to see if further evidence will emerge or if this marks the end of this particular political controversy.