Hillary Clinton Testifies She Had No Information on Epstein Crimes
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has informed House lawmakers during a closed-door deposition in New York that she possessed no knowledge regarding the criminal activities of financier Jeffrey Epstein or his associate Ghislaine Maxwell. Clinton further stated that she does not remember ever meeting Epstein personally.
Opening Statement Reveals Shock and Lack of Awareness
In an opening statement that was subsequently made public, Clinton expressed profound horror at the crimes that have since been exposed. She emphasized her complete unawareness of their illicit actions during the relevant periods. This testimony initiated a two-day series of depositions, which are also scheduled to include former President Bill Clinton.
Depositions Follow Months of Dispute with Oversight Committee
The depositions are being conducted in Chappaqua, New York, after months of contentious disagreement between the Clintons and the Republican-led House Oversight Committee. Lawmakers had previously rejected written statements provided by the couple and proceeded with subpoenas. Committee Chairman James Comer issued warnings about potential contempt proceedings if cooperation was not forthcoming.
Clinton Acknowledges Husband's Travels but Denies Personal Interactions
Hillary Clinton acknowledged that her husband, Bill Clinton, had undertaken trips connected to Epstein's charitable endeavors. However, she reiterated that she has no recollection of any personal interactions with Epstein herself. She confirmed encountering Ghislaine Maxwell at events hosted by the Clinton Foundation and noted that Maxwell attended their daughter Chelsea's wedding in 2010.
Bill Clinton Faces Renewed Scrutiny Amid Released Documents
Bill Clinton has encountered renewed examination after photographs featuring him appeared in documents released by the Department of Justice earlier this year. It is important to note that he has not been accused of any criminal wrongdoing related to Epstein. The investigation also aims to scrutinize how Epstein secured a controversial 2008 plea agreement in Florida.
Probe into Epstein's 2008 Plea Agreement and Lack of Federal Action
Lawmakers are probing the circumstances under which Epstein obtained a plea deal that allowed him to avoid federal charges after pleading guilty to state prostitution charges involving a minor. The inquiry seeks to understand why further federal action was not pursued at that time, raising questions about the handling of the case.
Clinton Criticizes Committee's Politically Selective Approach
Hillary Clinton criticized the committee's methodology, accusing Republicans of conducting a politically selective investigation that fails to scrutinize other prominent figures, including former President Donald Trump. Trump had previously authorized the release of additional Epstein-related files following significant public pressure.
Democrats Call for Broader Accountability and Inclusion of Trump
Meanwhile, Democrats on the committee have advocated for more comprehensive accountability. Representative Robert Garcia, the panel's top Democrat, argued that if former presidents are being questioned, Donald Trump should also appear before the committee. Committee leadership has stated that a sitting president cannot be deposed, highlighting procedural constraints.
Ongoing Public Pressure Drives Congressional Focus on Epstein Network
The renewed congressional focus reflects persistent public demand for transparency concerning Epstein's extensive network and the powerful individuals who associated with him prior to his 2019 death in federal custody while awaiting trial. This pressure underscores the societal call for clarity and justice.
Investigation to Continue with Potential Additional Witnesses
Lawmakers from both political parties have indicated that the investigation will proceed, with additional witnesses potentially being summoned. The committee seeks answers regarding Epstein's substantial wealth, his extensive connections, and the management of prior criminal cases, aiming to uncover the full scope of the matter.
