Kano Chief Danagundi Rejects Political Settlement for Emirate Crisis, Insists Supreme Court Must Decide
Kano Chief: No Political Deal Can Remove Emir Bayero

Kano Traditional Leader Firmly Rejects Political Resolution for Emirate Dispute

Alhaji Aminu Babba Danagundi, a prominent traditional title holder in Kano, has categorically dismissed growing speculation that political realignment could resolve the ongoing emirate crisis. The Sarkin Dawaki Babba of the Kano emirate maintains that no political consensus can lawfully remove Aminu Ado Bayero from his position as Emir of Kano.

Judicial Process as the Only Legitimate Path

In a recent interview with Daily Trust, Danagundi emphasized that the matter has progressed beyond informal negotiations and now rests squarely with the Supreme Court. He stated unequivocally that the legal process represents the only legitimate avenue for resolving the protracted standoff.

"As far as I know, we are in court, and the matter is now before the Supreme Court," Danagundi declared. "We are waiting for the Supreme Court to give its judgment."

The traditional leader expressed his unawareness of any consensus initiative and questioned who would be responsible for initiating such political maneuvers. He firmly rejected claims that political alignment could facilitate the exit of the Bayero family from the throne.

No Room for Out-of-Court Settlement

Danagundi played down the possibility of an out-of-court settlement, describing such assumptions as unrealistic. He argued that the extensive service record of the late Emir Ado Bayero, who served for over fifty years without committing any offense, justified succession within the family lineage.

"Ado Bayero served for over 50 years as Emir of Kano," Danagundi noted. "Throughout that period, he committed no offence. He did nothing wrong."

The chief maintained that, in his view, the succession should not pass to another lineage, reinforcing his commitment to preserving the Bayero family's traditional rights.

Focus on Due Process and Fundamental Rights

Explaining the substance of his legal challenge, Danagundi clarified that his case centers on the procedure adopted by the Kano State Government in repealing the existing emirate law and replacing it with new legislation. He emphasized that his action is not primarily about removing an emir but about ensuring compliance with due process.

Responding to arguments that emirate disputes fall under chieftaincy matters, Danagundi asserted that his suit is anchored on fundamental rights. He explained that the new law affected him personally and led to his removal from office, which he considers a violation of his constitutional rights.

Uncertain Outcome and Supreme Court's Final Say

Regarding how the crisis will eventually conclude, Danagundi admitted he cannot predict the outcome. He acknowledged that the final decision now lies with the Supreme Court and expressed his readiness to abide by whatever judgment the court delivers.

The traditional leader's statements come amid rising tensions in Kano following Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf's recent alignment with the All Progressives Congress. Many observers had speculated that this political shift might create opportunities for negotiated settlements, but Danagundi's firm position suggests otherwise.

Meanwhile, political dynamics continue to evolve, with former Governor Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso openly backing the reinstated Emir Lamido Sanusi and instructing his supporters to recognize only Sanusi as the legitimate traditional ruler. This development has triggered sharp reactions from supporters of the deposed emir, Aminu Ado Bayero, further complicating the already tense situation.

As the legal battle progresses through Nigeria's highest court, all parties await a definitive resolution to this complex traditional and political dispute that has captured national attention and divided opinions across Kano State and beyond.