Lagos Police Fire Teargas at Residents Protesting Demolitions at Assembly Complex
Operatives of the Lagos State Police Command on Tuesday, January 28, discharged teargas canisters at a group of residents who had organized a peaceful demonstration at the Lagos State House of Assembly complex. The protest was staged in opposition to ongoing demolition exercises affecting multiple communities across the state, sparking tensions and leading to injuries among the fleeing participants.
Protest Against Demolitions in Key Communities
The demonstrators had gathered at the assembly complex to voice their strong disapproval of the demolitions impacting several areas, including Makoko, Owode Onirin, Oworonshoki, Otumara, and Baba-Ijora. They accused the state government of executing these demolition activities without sufficient consultation, fair compensation, or viable resettlement plans for the affected residents. This lack of dialogue has fueled widespread discontent and prompted the public outcry.
Peaceful Gathering Turns Chaotic
What began as a peaceful assembly quickly escalated into a chaotic scene when police officers deployed teargas canisters to disperse the crowd. The protesters, caught off guard by the sudden use of force, immediately scattered and ran for safety. In the ensuing panic, some individuals sustained injuries while attempting to flee the area, highlighting the volatile nature of the confrontation.
The incident underscores the growing tensions between Lagos residents and authorities over urban development policies. Many community members feel marginalized by the government's approach to demolitions, which they argue disregards their livelihoods and housing needs. This protest is part of a broader pattern of resistance against what is perceived as insensitive governance in Nigeria's commercial capital.
As the situation unfolds, there are calls for greater transparency and engagement from the Lagos State Government to address the concerns of those affected by the demolitions. The use of teargas by police has drawn criticism from human rights advocates, who emphasize the importance of protecting citizens' rights to peaceful assembly and expression.
