Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has cautioned against proposals to suspend political campaigns in parts of northern Nigeria, arguing that such a move could undermine constitutional rights and heighten fears of disenfranchisement among citizens.
Senate considers halt to political activities
His reaction follows reports that the Senate is deliberating the suspension of political activities in several states grappling with rising insecurity, including Borno State, Benue State, and Plateau State. Lawmakers have expressed concern over the escalating violence, with some suggesting emergency measures to address the crisis.
Atiku's stance on democratic participation
In a statement issued by his aide, Phrank Shaibu, the presidential aspirant under the African Democratic Congress described the idea as troubling. He emphasized that insecurity should not be used as a justification to limit democratic participation. Atiku stressed that the right to vote and engage in the electoral process is fundamental and must not be restricted. He warned that any attempt to suppress political activity in parts of the country raises serious concerns about exclusion and representation.
Atiku added that tackling insecurity should not come at the expense of citizens' voices, noting that democracy must not suffer due to government shortcomings. He underscored that Nigerians, particularly those in the North, deserve both security and full participation in the political process.
Call for clarity from INEC and security agencies
He also called on the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), security agencies, and the administration of President Bola Tinubu to clarify their positions and reassure citizens that constitutional rights would be protected.
The debate comes amid growing concern in the National Assembly over worsening violence in parts of northern Nigeria. Lawmakers, including Senator Abdul Ningi, have suggested emergency measures such as suspending political activities in frontline states affected by insurgency and banditry. They argue that the scale of the crisis requires urgent action beyond routine discussions.
