Nigerian Man Lists 4 Key Incidents to Prove Super Eagles Were Robbed in AFCON Semi-Final
Man Claims Nigeria Robbed in AFCON Semi-Final vs Morocco

A Nigerian football fan has ignited a fierce online debate by presenting a detailed case alleging that the Super Eagles were unfairly treated during their Africa Cup of Nations semi-final clash against Morocco. The young man, using the social media handle @adika.s.takes, shared a video analysis where he pinpointed four critical moments he believes cost Nigeria the match.

"Concrete Evidence" of Officiating Bias

In the video posted on TikTok, the man stated emphatically that Nigeria was "100% robbed and cheated" by the match officials. He urged Nigerians not to be "gaslighted" into believing the referee had no impact on the result of the high-stakes game played on January 15, 2026. His primary contention was the appointment of a Ghanaian referee for a match involving Nigeria, citing the long-standing football rivalry between the two West African nations.

"It is very unethical for Nigeria to be playing a semi-final of AFCON and the referee is Ghanaian. It is wrong," he argued, also questioning the presence of a South African assistant referee.

Breakdown of the Four Controversial Incidents

The analyst broke down his evidence into what he termed "exhibits," each tied to a specific minute in the game:

Exhibit A (33rd minute): He claimed that defender Calvin Bassey was shown a yellow card after a tussle with Morocco's Ibrahim Diaz, despite Diaz allegedly pulling Bassey's jersey. The foul, however, was awarded to Morocco.

Exhibit B (65th minute): Following a decision against him, a Moroccan player kicked the ball out of the stadium in apparent frustration. The man argued that this act should have resulted in a mandatory yellow card under any football rules, but the referee only issued a verbal caution.

Exhibit C (68th minute): He highlighted a moment where Super Eagles' Bruno Onyemaechi received the ball on the line, which did not appear to have gone out for a throw-in. The referee's decision to stop play left even the Moroccan players confused, according to the analysis.

Exhibit D (88th minute): In a chase for the ball between Nigeria's Moses Simon and Morocco's Achraf Hakimi, Hakimi was adjudged to have been fouled after kicking the ball out. The analyst believed Simon was the wronged party.

He also referenced a 99th-minute incident where Ibrahim Diaz allegedly pulled Onyemaechi back by his shirt without punishment, mirroring the first exhibit.

Mixed Reactions from Football Fans

The claims sparked widespread reactions on social media. Some users agreed with the assessment of poor officiating. One user, CR7 DAUGHTER, commented, "Cameroonians complained about this and people called us crying babies. The poor officiating to favour Morocco is too much." A Ghanaian user, @khofimhole, even expressed disappointment in the referee's performance.

However, others countered that Nigeria's own performance was to blame. Critics pointed out that the Super Eagles managed only two shots on target throughout 120 minutes of play. User Mr.M questioned, "Who prevent you from playing shot on target?" Another, shaban7070, stated, "You played 120 mins, 2 shot and you are blaming ref. Mr Adika you can do better."

The debate underscores the intense emotions surrounding the Super Eagles' exit from the tournament and raises persistent questions about the consistency and perceived neutrality of officiating in African football. The man concluded his video by insisting that Nigeria could have played its best football had the officiating been fair, a sentiment that continues to resonate with a section of the team's supporters.