Human rights activist and lawyer, Deji Adeyanju, has strongly criticised opposition political figures for their reaction to the arrest of former Attorney-General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami, SAN, by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).
Inconsistent Stance on Accountability
In a statement issued on Friday, 12 January 2026, Adeyanju described the opposition's defence of Malami as troubling and inconsistent with their public claims of commitment to governance reform and accountability. He argued that it is contradictory for political actors to publicly defend individuals under investigation while simultaneously calling for systemic change in Nigeria's anti-corruption framework.
Abubakar Malami, who served as the nation's chief law officer under the previous administration, was recently taken into custody by the EFCC. The commission is investigating allegations of financial impropriety, including claims of unlawful asset acquisition. It is crucial to note that the EFCC has not concluded its investigation, and Malami has not been convicted of any offence.
Undermining Public Confidence
Adeyanju stressed that defending any individual at this investigatory stage, rather than allowing the EFCC to carry out its work without interference, actively undermines public confidence in the fight against graft. He emphasised that the role of an anti-graft agency is to investigate anyone facing credible allegations, irrespective of their political affiliation or former status.
According to the activist, the appropriate response from opposition parties should have been to demand a broader and more consistent application of anti-corruption laws across all political lines. Instead of criticising the EFCC for acting on allegations, he said they should advocate for the agency to operate without intimidation, public pressure, or partisan interference.
A Warning Against Selective Outrage
Adeyanju issued a stern warning against what he termed "selective outrage," where corruption investigations are supported or opposed based purely on political convenience. He cited previous cases involving other former public officials, arguing that consistency in enforcement is the only path to restoring trust in Nigeria's public institutions.
While reaffirming his support for due process and the rule of law—noting that an investigation does not equate to guilt and that every individual is entitled to a fair hearing—Adeyanju was unequivocal on one point: no public office holder, past or present, should be shielded from scrutiny. He concluded that Nigeria's progress fundamentally depends on robust, impartial institutions free from partisan manipulation.
