In a significant legal development, the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory in Abuja has officially terminated the criminal prosecution initiated by the Federal Government against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan. The case was struck out on Thursday, 15 January 2026, following a formal withdrawal by the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF).
Case Withdrawn by Federal Prosecutors
The court action came to an end after the AGF filed a Notice of Discontinuance, effectively halting the criminal defamation and related charges against the senator representing Kogi Central. The suit, which bore the number FHC/ABJ/CR/195/2025, had been pending before the court for several months.
During the resumed hearing, the prosecution formally presented the notice, dated 12 December 2025, to the court. Presiding judge, Justice C. N. Oji, acknowledged the filing and subsequently struck out the case. The Federal Government's counsel confirmed the decision in open court, stating it was made in accordance with the Administration of Criminal Justice Act and guided by the broader interest of justice.
Judge's Remarks and Senator's Reaction
In his brief comments, Justice Oji noted that the withdrawal highlighted the necessity for restraint in using prosecutorial powers, especially in matters with considerable public and political ramifications. He expressed optimism that this move would bolster respect for the rule of law and support democratic stability in Nigeria.
Speaking after the court session, Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan welcomed the outcome as a personal vindication and a reinforcement of her trust in the judiciary. "This ruling shows that the rule of law remains the bedrock of our democracy," she stated. The senator added that she would now concentrate fully on her legislative responsibilities and serving the people of Kogi Central, while also thanking her legal team and supporters for their steadfastness.
National Debate and Implications
The charges against the senator originated from comments she allegedly made during a televised interview. The case had sparked intense national debate, drawing criticism from civil society organisations, legal experts, and political analysts who viewed it as a potential tool to suppress free speech and political dissent.
With the case now closed, it is expected to reignite crucial conversations about the boundaries of criminal prosecution in political discourse and the appropriate application of state power in a democratic society. The development marks the end of a legal battle that had captured significant public attention across Nigeria.
