Nigeria's public sector reforms are not yielding results, according to a leading scholar of Public Administration, Prof. Ehiyamen Mediayanose Osezua. He described the ongoing reforms as mere motion without movement, lacking service-delivery outcomes.
Inaugural Lecture at OAUSTECH
Delivering the 11th Inaugural Lecture at the Olusegun Agagu University of Science and Technology (OAUSTECH), Okitipupa, Ondo State, titled 'Governing Without Results: Public Administration, Leadership and Institutional Failure In Nigeria. Quo Vadis?', Osezua noted that governance systems in the country remain active but development outcomes are uneven.
According to him, the tragedy of Nigeria is not that it lacks institutions, talent, or resources. 'The greater tragedy is that these have too often not been mobilised with sufficient integrity, discipline, competence, and developmental clarity.'
'Governance effectiveness depends fundamentally on the capacity of institutions to cultivate performance-oriented leadership, enforce ethical and professional norms, and translate policy intent into measurable public value,' he said.
Governing Without Results
Osezua, who is the Dean of the School of Management Sciences, stated that Nigeria's experience reflects a broader governance paradox in which administrative systems remain structurally active, yet functionally constrained, producing what may be conceptualised as a condition of 'governing without results.'
He added: 'This condition exemplifies the central thrust of this lecture: that governing without results reflects not the absence of administrative structures, but the weakness of institutional mechanisms required to translate policy intent into public value.'
Higher Education as a Case Study
Alluding to higher education governance as an empirical lens for understanding institutional failure in Nigeria, Osezua noted that 'institutional failure is not solely a function of financial scarcity or policy inadequacy but also of leadership praxis and accountability discipline.'
He said that a useful entry point into the problem of institutional failure in Nigerian higher education is the contrast between system expansion and institutional experience. 'As of 20 March 2026, the National Universities Commission recognises 309 universities in Nigeria, comprising 74 federal, 67 state, and 168 private universities.'
'This numerical growth suggests an expanding university system. Yet the same policy environment now reflects concern about whether the rapid multiplication of institutions has been matched by adequate funding, infrastructure, staffing, and governance capacity.'
'Indeed, in August 2025, the Federal Government imposed a seven-year moratorium on the establishment of new federal universities, polytechnics, and colleges of education, citing overstretched resources, under-utilised institutions, and declining academic quality.'
'The implication is clear: the problem is no longer simply one of access or proliferation, but one of whether the system possesses the institutional depth to sustain quality.'
Budgetary Challenges
Citing funding data, he stated that in the 2026 education budget proposal, the Federal Government allocated N966.9 billion to universities, which represents the largest single share within the education sector envelope presented by the Ministry of Education.
'On paper, this appears substantial. However, recent official budget defence proceedings before the National Assembly also reveal persistent concern about capital planning, fiscal discipline, monitoring, accountability, and the effective use of appropriated funds in the Nigerian university system. In other words, the challenge is not merely the size of allocation, but the enduring gap between budgetary promises and institutional delivery.'
'Universities do not experience budget figures in the abstract; they experience them through laboratories, classrooms, staff welfare, research support, power supply, digital infrastructure, and the regularity of institutional processes.'
'When releases are delayed, implementation weak, or capital projects poorly executed, the academic experience remains fragile despite impressive appropriation headlines.'
Reform Rhetoric vs. Reality
Osezua argued that 'reform, in other words, should not be measured only by policy launches, curriculum redesign, or official roadmaps, but by whether it improves the lived reality of the university as a community of scholarship.'
He emphasised that this is where the concept of institutional failure becomes especially useful. 'Nigerian universities today do not suffer only from shortage of funds or periodic union disputes. They suffer from a deeper disconnect between reform rhetoric and institutional experience.'
'A system may record more universities, more policies, more roadmaps, and more agreements, yet still leave academics working within unstable calendars, uncertain welfare conditions, weak research support, inadequate infrastructure, and inconsistent administrative implementation.'
'The issue, therefore, is not simply whether reforms exist, but whether institutions are sufficiently resilient, accountable, and well-led to convert reforms into results. That, perhaps, is one of the clearest illustrations of what it means to govern a university system without producing commensurate outcomes,' Osezua said.
Event Details
The inaugural lecture, held at the university's main auditorium, was chaired by the institution's Vice Chancellor, Prof. Temi Emmanuel Ologunorisa. It was also graced by the Deputy Vice Chancellor for Academics and Research, Prof. Foluso Olutope Adetuyi; Deputy Vice Chancellor for Administration and Development, Prof. Dipo Theophilus Akomolafe; and the Registrar, Mr. Abiodun Peter Okunniga.
Other principal officials at the event included the University Bursar, Mr. Ganiyu Bamidele Aminu, and the Librarian, Dr. Adetoun Adebisi Oyelude.
