In a dramatic courtroom scene, Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court in Abuja ordered the removal of Nnamdi Kanu and subsequently ruled that the judgment in his terrorism-related trial would be delivered in his absence. The decision on November 20, 2025, followed a major disruption where Kanu openly challenged the judge's authority.
Courtroom Eruption Leads to Removal
The proceedings, which were scheduled for the continuation of the long-running trial, took a tense turn. Prior to the confrontation, Justice James Omotosho dismissed three new applications filed by Kanu's legal team. The judge declared the motions lacked merit, as the court had already fixed a date for judgment.
When the court attempted to proceed with delivering its ruling, Nnamdi Kanu strongly objected. He raised his voice, insisting the process could not continue because he had not submitted his final written address. The situation escalated when Kanu accused Justice Omotosho of bias and publicly stated that the judge "did not know the law."
Judge's Decisive Action and Ruling
This direct challenge from the defendant prompted an immediate response from the bench. Justice Omotosho ordered security personnel to escort Kanu out of the courtroom. Following the IPOB leader's removal, the session was reconvened.
It was at this point that Justice Omotosho made the significant announcement. He stated that despite the defendant's absence, the judgment in the terrorism case would proceed as planned. The ruling, initially meant for November 20, will now be delivered on a future date in line with the court's new directive, but without Kanu being present in the courtroom.
Implications of the Court's Decision
This event marks a pivotal moment in a case that has drawn significant national and international attention. The court's move to deliver a verdict without the defendant physically present underscores the judiciary's stance on maintaining order and procedure, even in highly charged and politically sensitive trials. All eyes will now be on the Federal High Court in Abuja for the final judgment in this closely watched terrorism case.
