In a significant ruling that has captured national attention, Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court in Abuja has publicly detailed the reasoning behind his decision to sentence Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), to life imprisonment rather than the death penalty.
The Judicial Rationale for Mercy
Justice Omotosho delivered the life sentence conviction on Thursday, November 20, 2025, following Kanu's conviction on terrorism charges. The judge explicitly stated that while the existing legal framework permitted the imposition of the death penalty, he consciously chose a path of mercy.
He anchored his decision on religious doctrines and global trends, directly quoting teachings from the Holy Book. "Jesus Christ taught His followers to show mercy. The death penalty is gradually being abolished in many countries, and religious doctrines advocate compassion," Justice Omotosho remarked, referencing the book of Matthew.
Stringent Conditions of Detention
The court has mandated specific and stringent conditions for Kanu's incarceration to reflect the gravity of the sentence while ensuring his safety. In a crucial directive, Justice Omotosho ruled that Nnamdi Kanu is not to be held at the Kuje Correctional Centre, deeming the facility unsuitable for the intended purpose of his sentence.
Instead, the judge ordered that Kanu be placed in protective custody at a secure location that must be approved by the relevant authorities. Furthermore, the court has severely restricted his access to the outside world, ruling that he must not use any electronic devices unless under the strict and direct supervision of the Office of the National Security Adviser.
Asset Forfeiture and Legal Consequences
As part of the judgment, the court also addressed assets linked to Kanu's activities. Justice Omotosho directed the immediate forfeiture of the transmitter used for Kanu's broadcasts to the Federal Government.
The judge issued a clear warning that other equipment associated with the case would be subject to confiscation if no appeal is filed against the judgment. This measure reinforces the legal consequences of the actions for which Kanu was convicted, extending the ruling's impact beyond his personal sentence to the operational capacity of the proscribed group.
